Theory of Everything

Please show me where this is wrong...

in my theory space is a substance and in order for motion to move and have shape it needs space for its movements and to "encapsulate" it.

any way here is the basics. This is written so general people can follow so if you are a scientist you may not enjoy the terminology used but pretty sure you will understand what I mean .


over the past few years I have come up with enough ideas to finally conclude (at least to me ) the theory of everything.

Looking at it now, the Concept was simple

I realized an overall energy was there, motion and that everything lead to motion (all energy is motion all matter is motion)

and knowing that motion needed a "shell" to hold it all, it lead to space .

I realized without motion you have no time and I realized Gravity coming directly from motion as well

the concept was simple and fit the complex ..why do we see, hear, smell, walk on top of the ground, have trees, houses, space, stars, electricity, gravity, magnetism, atoms, protons, neutrons, electrons, music, radio waves, infra red light, gamma rays, expansion of space time.. all of it is answered ,everything by motion meaning  vibrational frequencies and movements of all types ,motion forms its own various shapes by its movements, space encapsulates these movements.
it all fits in with this simple conclusion..

motion is why..motion through space produces everything.

all the things listed above and the thousands of other things not... are because each one is brought on by motion, be it vibrational wave, slow, fast, super fast spinning with vibrations, spinning vibrating and ...

well you can mix it all around and depending on rates of speed or vibrational spin any type of motion you can think of it will produce the different particle or particles, this motion through space (vibration is motion through space just a small amount of space, but motion through space) makes it all ..

space will bend and fold or other depending on the speed of the motion and directions,this gives the motion its shape and space "holding" its shape in place.

when atoms come together, space is folding for attraction ..

this is the basic concept and easy to understand my theory is called the moving toe

Very interesting. I really enjoyed reading this, thank you.

For my personal clarificaiton, you are saying "space is folding" meaning forming shape/matter and that atoms are not attracted to one another. Is this correct?

Is this an alternative to the elusive Higg's boson particle that supposedly binds all matter together?

Thank you for your response Phoenix_Enflame..

space folding is the cause of atoms being held in "shape" this shape being directly linked to its movents ie motion..

it is held in shape by space "folding" from the deepest insides to the outer ..and depending on this motion it creates its shape by space

any particle is made like this, it is because of motion and space folding. The same thing with say a proton, its shape is given by the way it moves, all the motion, every bit from inside of it, with space "folding" around it, this space folding is what holds it all together this space folding is the "Glue" of matter and all its parts

Thank you for explaining that, I appreciate it.  

 

#6 (permalink)       3 Hours Ago

ldibart Thinking Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Haverhill, mass Posts: 20 Blog Entries: 1

Re: Possible theory of everything Quote: Originally Posted by maddog Hmm, Interesting ... This maybe a start. I am not sure where to take it next... !?! BTW, earlier in my freshman college days, I speculated the idea -- "What if Space itself were Quantized ?" -- I coined the term "Metrons". Little did I know that I wasn't alone. I read recently where this is a central theme inside Loop Quantum Gravity (Look for a book by Lee Smolin). It turns out the label "Metrons" was also taken as well. Gosh! Your TOE theory has similarities LQG -- Latest rendition by t'Hooft and Smolin. maddog Hi maddog thank you for your response, I will definitely look at LQG!

A TOE would have to explain the causes of motion (even the "original" motion, if there was one). What is your take on that? Funky theory name, by the way.
	Posted 17 Hours Ago at 01:35 AM by Tormod

hello Ok thanks I know since it is a scientific "Theory" I will not start at the original motion bringer, lol now moving on, in this extremely hot dense "spot" where everything was, it was highly energized (motion) this energy actually made it be so "dense"because it was moving very fast and it moved and pushed in all directions space resisted it with as much binding force as motion gave off ie extremely small and hot . as the energy slowed down its motion, space began to "loosen its grip" as the grip got loosened space began expanding as space expanded the the motion had more freedom to move and form within the space this is basically it . yes thanks, I couldn't resist naming it that lol

Yes this statement is not part of the replies or responses I am adding it ..the way I explain things is simple to the point of dumb looking hehehe but my point is valid in such that I do believe that the way it cooled not increased in temperature or movement is what made it expand rapidly ..it was not a bang or an explosion it was a fast moving expansion . most likely can parts of it have exploded probably but in general i feel most of it was just expansion rapidly